Diaspora Yeshiva · Jerusalem · Since 1967

Learn Torah in Jerusalem

A beis midrash of nearly sixty years beside King David's Tomb — where Jews from every corner of the world come home to the Gemara.

Come Learn With Us →

This Week from the Beis Midrash

This week the beis midrash took up one of the sharpest questions in the laws of testimony: ein ed naaseh dayan — a witness cannot become a judge. Can the very people who saw the matter sit in judgment on it? The Gemara's answer reshapes how we understand both roles.

What the sugya asks

Three judges sit to validate a document. Two of them recognize the signatures themselves. Must they testify before the third — and may they then judge the very testimony they gave?

The turn in the Gemara

The Torah requires testimony to be given before judges — so witness and judge are two distinct roles, and one person cannot hold both in the same matter at once. The sugya tests this against document validation, which is d'Rabbanan, and against an expert judge sitting alone.

What it demands of us

The Rambam's two approaches turn on a fine point: is a judge's own knowledge the same as testimony he has heard? The shiur walks the answers, Tosfos, and what separates knowing from hearing.

The 3-Minute Recap — Listen

No time for the full shiur? The week's sugya as a short podcast — generated automatically from the recording.

From the Shiur — In Writing

Can the one who saw it be the one who judges it? That question — ein ed naaseh dayan, a witness may not become a judge — stood at the center of this week's shiur, and like every good sugya it starts from a case that sounds almost technical and ends by teaching what judgment itself is.

The case: three judges sit to validate a document — kiyum shtaros. Two of the three recognize the signatures with their own eyes. May they simply say so and, together with the third, validate the document? Or have they now become witnesses — and the Torah says testimony must be given before judges, which would mean they can no longer sit as judges in this matter?

Tosfos sharpens the principle: witness and judge are two distinct entities, and one person cannot be both at once in the same matter. The witness stands and speaks; the judges sit and weigh. If the two who recognize the signatures testify before the third, the bench itself has changed — those who spoke can no longer weigh what they said.

The shiur then walked the classic paths through the difficulty: that document validation is d'Rabbanan, where the Sages were more lenient than in Torah-level testimony; the case of the mumcheh, the expert judge; and the Rambam's two answers, which hinge on a beautiful distinction — is a judge's own knowledge of the facts the same as testimony he has heard? If knowledge counts as hearing, one door opens; if the Torah insists on the spoken word before the court, another closes.

From there the shiur pressed further: what of a judge who is discovered to be a thief — can he sit at all? The disqualifications of witnesses and judges turn out to flow from the same root: the court's word is only as trustworthy as the people who carry it.

And the learning closed where the Shema does — b'chol nafshecha u'v'chol me'odecha, with all your soul and with all your possessions. Why must the Torah add "your possessions" after "your soul"? Because, as the Gemara says, there are people whose money is dearer to them than their life — and the Torah asks for the love of Hashem to stand above both.

Underneath the give-and-take stands a quiet lesson about judgment: the Torah separates the one who experiences from the one who weighs, because a judge must stand outside what he decides. Two hours of Gemara — and a discipline for anyone who must judge fairly: first know whether you are standing in the witness's place or the judge's, because no one can stand in both.

Words that Stay With You

"We need them to give their testimony in front of the judges — that is the Torah's requirement."From this week's shiur · on Devarim's laws of testimony
"You cannot have two entities at once — the witness stands before the court; the judge sits within it."From this week's shiur · Tosfos on ein ed naaseh dayan
"Is a judge's own knowledge the same as testimony he has heard? On that one distinction, the Rambam's two answers turn."From this week's shiur · the Rambam on kiyum shtaros

Ready-to-post cards — generated from the same shiur:

Moments Worth Rewatching

2:20"Testimony in front of judges" — the Torah's baseline that drives the whole sugya 3:34The case: three judges, two recognize the signatures — may they judge? 7:36Judging on their own knowledge — where knowing and hearing part ways 12:43"Two entities at once" — Tosfos' principle in one line

Come Learn With Us

Since 1967, the Diaspora Yeshiva has welcomed Jews from every background — from those opening a Gemara for the first time to advanced talmidim — to learn Torah in Jerusalem, in a beis midrash overlooking the Old City, beside King David's Tomb.

Full beis midrash program
Gemara b'iyun, halacha, mussar — with rabbeim who learn with you, not at you.
Every level welcome
Programs for beginners and advanced learners; personal chavruta from day one.
Live in Jerusalem
Dormitory and meals on-site — wake up to the walls of the Old City.
Apply / Ask About Learning Here

Or write to us on WhatsApp: (number to be provided by the Yeshiva)

Sustain a Torah Home of Sixty Years

Every shiur in this beis midrash is carried by friends of the Yeshiva around the world. Support goes directly to the Diaspora Yeshiva.

Support the Yeshiva